View Full Version : Are there any Waldorf fans?
~skyborg12
July 24th, 2003, 02:57 PM
I always see Waldorf synths on the web and in catalogs, but have never had a chance to try one.
Are they pretty cool?
~pop
July 24th, 2003, 03:01 PM
Yes, but it doesn't sound analogish at all..
Waldorf has their own flavor of analogish sound.
I mean their representation of analogish sounds
I used to have the Microwave and sampled the hell out of it before I got rid of it. MicroQ is very cheap now. It is worth the price.
~skyborg12
July 24th, 2003, 03:09 PM
That is good to know. I see that there is a brand new Moog out. I will only be able to dream about having that one.
~Scar Chemik
July 24th, 2003, 04:07 PM
We have a WaveXT, MicroQ, and Pulse+ in our studio. I love them all. I'm with pop, Wladorf has their own sound.
Can't go wrong.
~Kirlian Blue
July 24th, 2003, 04:13 PM
waldorf xtk2 and the PPG WAVE 2.3 ...f**king best synths known to man i use them a lot on my studio work and the PPG Wave jesus what a monster nothing touches my blue bit,ch !!!
~NullDevice
July 24th, 2003, 05:02 PM
The MicrowaveXT is brilliant.
Wavetable synths, but they have such fat and cutting sounds. Mmm.
The MicroQ is not quite as cool, but it's still pretty cool.
~skyborg12
July 24th, 2003, 05:48 PM
Thanks for the feedback everybody. I wish I could play one.
How would you rate them compared to a Clavia/Nord.
~Kirlian Blue
July 24th, 2003, 06:10 PM
I prefer waldorfs as theyre the most powerfull synths ive ever used Nord are brilliant but the Waldorf is like a Steamroller it just hammers in:)
~TECHPO12
July 24th, 2003, 07:33 PM
Waldorf is in the house!!!! Chris just come out here to Logan and play around with the Pulse I have. Yeah, Waldorf's do rock! Although I still would rather have older analog synths than newer ones but that's just my humble opinion.
Techpo
~NullDevice
July 24th, 2003, 08:11 PM
Compared to a Nord?
Different.
Usually.
Depends on the synth.
The MicroQ is probably equivalent to the NordLead2. Similar architectures, anyway. Waldorf filters have a distinctive sound, as do Clavia. I lean slightly towards the waldorf on this one, but the Nord probably has a more "biting" and aggressive sound.
As for the Microwave - different architecture entirely. It's wavetable, the Nords are analog-modelling. Does metallic sounds, big sweepy pads, and leads very well, but probably not quite cut out for warm analog basses (although it has good bass patches of its own). Vince Clarke used the Wave (precursor to the microwave) for most of the Yaz records, so you can get an idea of what sorts of sounds it makes from those. F242 uses the waldorf gear a lot too now.
Waldorf has some decent demoes on thier website, worth checking out.
~pop
July 25th, 2003, 03:05 AM
Mr. Device is correct.
MW is great for creating that COLD analog emulation.
If you want pad sounds that cuts like a knife, it is the tool for it.
I hate spamming, but just show you an example of cutting pad sounds like....
http://artists.mp3s.com/artist_song/3337/3337030.html
Everything is MW samples besides drums, guitar, and bass.
~skyborg12
July 25th, 2003, 09:46 AM
Originally posted by TECHPO12
Chris just come out here to Logan and play around with the Pulse I have. Yeah, Waldorf's do rock!
Techpo
Whoa you have a Waldorf now!! Cool. Did that Virus ever come from Slovenia or whever you bought it from?
See you in PArk City tonight for PVD!
Chris
~intro
July 27th, 2003, 06:26 AM
I've got a micro Q, it sounds great. Very unique though. All the comments that Waldorf have their own sound are dead on. Mark (Cosmicity) once said to me that he hates his Waldorf, because every time he uses it, everything else in the mix sounds crap by comparison.
-Mark
www.djintrovert.com
vBulletin® v3.8.0 Release Candidate 2, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.