|
GARY NUMAN
 
Gary Numan has seen his career reach the pinnacle of
number 1 chart success, slide into relative obscurity and
then to resurge with an independent spirit. With the
recent release of a career retrospective CD “Exposure“, a
new album in the works for 2003 and his 25th anniversary
of being a professional musician approaching; the
Electrogarden took some time to speak with Gary about his
career and what we can expect from him in the future.
EN:
Your music has taken a much darker turn over the last few
albums. What has been your greatest influence over your
style?
Gary:
I think as the 80's progressed, and even into the early
90's, my reasons for writing songs had become more along
the lines of trying to salvage my career, which was in
deep trouble, than actually writing things I genuinely
loved. It took me too long to realise that I had
completely lost my way, musically speaking, but I did
eventually. At that point I stopped, took some time to
think about how and why I had changed and what I needed to
do about it. The influence came from the decision to give
up on trying to save the career and just go back to
writing from the heart, with no thoughts about contracts
and radio play and selling records. Effectively I quit and
started to make music for a hobby again. I didn't even
have a record deal at the time. As soon as I started
writing from the heart again, the way I used to when I
first became interested in making music, it all got much
darker and I began to genuinely enjoy making music once
again. It had been a long time since I'd really been happy
with what I was doing. My style is influenced by many
things. First of all I can't actually play guitar or
keyboards very well and so my lack of musical prowess
means that I have to concentrate on other things, such as
mood and atmosphere. That obviously has something to do
with the way it sounds. You don't hear virtuoso guitar
solos on my stuff for example. I'm also tied in to
technology in a major way and so much of the sound is
technology driven and constantly evolves as new ways of
manipulating sounds are made available. When it comes to
just listening to other bands for ideas I do that all the
time. I listen to lots of stuff, mainly heavy and dark.
I'm still learning and the world is full of clever people
that i can learn from.
EN:
What can your fans expect from the new album you are hard
at working recording for next years release?
Gary:
I was very happy with the last album 'Pure'. But I think
it can be darker, heavier and more aggressive and so I
want to continue along that general path but just get
better at it. I like where I am at the moment. I don't
want to move into another style of music but I do want to
keep moving forward. I want the album to be full of huge,
menacing grooves with massive anthemic choruses, plenty of
those 'here comes the good bit' quiet moments before the
whole world comes thundering in. I think that sums up my
intentions for it. Probably sound like shit though and my
career resurgence will be over. Time will tell.
EN:
One of your greatest commercial successes occurred very
early in your career, "Cars". Do you ever find it
difficult to shake your early 80's success and the retro
stigma of 80's music? Any marketing plans to take
advantage of the swelling nostalgic interest of 80s music?
Gary:
I have no marketing plans whatsoever to take 'advantage'
of any nostalgic interest in '80's music. I hate nostalgia
in music. People reliving the past by going to gigs by
yesterdays pop stars to relive their youth is such a sad
concept. I've said No to every nostalgia tour that's been
offered. Having had big success before, my biggest year
was actually in '79, can become a weight that hangs around
your neck and I've worked hard to try and wriggle out of
any 80's connection because it stops people from accepting
what you are doing now. Understandably in most cases
because most 80's acts are still churning out the same old
sound and seem unwilling to move on. I'm not like that. I
couldn't wait to see the back of the 80's, and the 90's
for that matter. I still think my best album is to come
and it won't sound anything like 'Cars'.
 
EN:
You have stated that you are not necessarily interested in
chart success. What drives Gary Numan? Do you deliberately
turn your music a darker shade to thumb your nose at pop
music?
Gary:
I'm not interested in writing songs to get chart success.
I used to be though and that was the major part of the
problem that I referred to in answering your first
question. It was getting away from that attitude that has
helped my song writing improve in the last 10 years and
turned my music in a much darker direction. It's easy for
me to prove as well. The only single I've put out recently
has been 'Rip', which did get into the UK chart strangely
enough, but it did it without any major radio play as it
was considered way too heavy by play list standards. All
of my three albums that I've released over the last 10
years have been dark and in no way suitable for day time
radio. I made a conscious decision to take my music that
way knowing that it was, commercially speaking, one step
away from career suicide. But I wanted to write songs that
I'm proud of, not something sanitized and sweet that would
sit comfortably on day-time radio next to Kylie (no
offence intended to Kylie) and Gareth Gates. However, it
would be untrue to say that I'm not interested in chart
success. I'm very interested in it. I just want it with
music that I care about. I did it with 'Rip' so it can be
done, even in a music business that is so dominated by
pure pop music.
EN:
What are the proudest moments of your career? What do you
find most disappointing or any regrets?
Gary:
Getting to number 1 in the album and single charts at the
same time is something I'm proud of. I did it twice
actually with different album and single combinations. I
think the most proud I've been though was this year.
Sugababes were Number 1 with a song that used the music
from my 1979 'Are Friends Electric' song and I was Number
1 on the interactive Kerrang TV channel with 'Rip'. So I
spanned nearly 23 years of music at the same time. A
little later 'Rip' itself entered the main UK chart and
become the first chart success I'd had in my own right for
several years. Considering that I'd been written off by
virtually every music mag in the country over the previous
10 years, and had been dropped by my previous record
company only a few months before Rip charted, it all felt
pretty good. I do regret many things, mostly though I
regret losing my way as a songwriter throughout most of
the late 80's and early 90's. I can't believe how bad it
got before I even noticed anything was wrong with what I
was doing. It was a pathetic inability to really see what
was going on. It won't happen again.
EN:
You have stated that your music is only finished upon a
deadline arriving. Would you consider yourself obsessive
about your craft? Talk about the process you go through
for writing a typical Gary Numan song.
Gary:
Not much of a process really. It starts in different ways,
sometimes melody first, sometimes groove built up through
layers of loops or noise samples. I don't really have a
set way of doing anything and it seems to be as chaotic
one day as any other. I do think I'm obsessive about what
I do though but not in a good way. I'm eaten up by self
doubt and a crippling lack of confidence. The reason my
albums are always late and are eventually only delivered
to the label when they give me an absolute now or never
deadline is because I know they could be better. They can
always be better and that knowledge haunts me as each one
is released. Each new album is just an excuse for me to
make up for the mistakes on the previous one.
EN:
What album were you most satisfied with immediately upon
completion and why?
Gary:
Pure. It had been a nightmare to make, My dog died, my Nan
died, our unborn baby died all while I was making it. It
was an incredibly difficult time and I knew the album was
vital if my career resurgence was to be more than a brief
flicker in the dark. It felt like the best album I'd ever
made. It IS the best album I've ever made. I was glad that
the making it was over as much as anything else. I'd
become quite ill with worry for much of it. I'd succeeded
in making music a hobby again but that, strangely, had
also revitalized my career and so many of the old
pressures resurfaced. I thought Pure was the right album
at just the right time.
EN:
What advice would you give budding electronic musicians
just starting out in today's market? Do think it is easier
or harder in 2002 to find success in the music business?
Gary:
It seems very hard to me at any time to find success and
it seems far harder to keep it should you be lucky enough
to get it in the first place. Getting success is
definitely so much easier than keeping it. I wouldn't dare
give advice to anyone, look what a complete bollocks I've
made of most of my career. Still, in the spirit of trying
to answer your question my reluctant advice is: Don't
listen to advice. Most of them are wrong and few of them
will share or even understand your vision. Anyone that
says you're shit is probably lying, anyone that says
you're brilliant is probably wrong (and lying), just
believe in what you do and, most of all, make sure you
enjoy TRYING to succeed. It's as much about enjoying the
journey as it is arriving at the Rock Star hotel.
EN:
Your 25th anniversary of being a professional musician is
coming in February 2003. Any special plans or tours
scheduled?
Gary:
A little 2 or 3 gig weekender in the UK near February 10th
is about all. I have the new album to get finished if I'm
to have another few years doing this. And I do want to do
this for much longer than 25 years.
EN:
You
seem to be interested in the dark nature of man. What do
you think ultimately motivates people to do what they do
and why?
Gary: Greed mainly and this strange need to want to
feel 'better' than those around them. Hence money becomes
a big deal for some people, positions of power and
influence are what drives others. In some a need to hurt
others gives certain sick individuals the personal
dominating satisfaction they require. Mostly people value
what they are in terms of how much better or worse it is
than those around them. The big fish in a little pond
syndrome is everywhere. Then of course you get the big
players who want to be the biggest fish in the biggest
ocean. It's all nasty and scary and I'm no less motivated
by such things than most. Man (and woman) is basically a
bit frightening when you strip away all the bullshit of so
called 'civilization' and see what makes even 'ordinary'
people tick. Or so it seems to me but I could, of course,
be completely wrong. I do not believe in the inherent
kindness of man, quite the opposite.
EN:
What bands today do you find most intriguing? What do you
find yourself listening to these days?
Gary:
I find most of the really interesting music in film scores
these days but I also listen to NIN, Marilyn Manson, Korn
and a whole mass of newer bands whose names I can never
remember.
EN:
Electronic music in the 90s seemed to go through a
tremendously difficult time period. It seems that the only
bands that were able to thrive held a large following in
the gothic community. Why do you think that is?
Gary:
I didn't know that was the case so I can't really comment
on why that should be. I don't really follow the fortunes
of any style of music, electronic or otherwise. Generally,
I'm too self absorbed in my own problems to really care
actually. I've always been uneasy with becoming identified
with any group, gothic or any other, as that can, by
definition, say things about your music that isn't
strictly true and it can limit any spreading over from one
group of musical taste to another. It's nice to have a
strong following but dangerous if that very following then
limits the way in which your music can evolve through fear
of losing that support. But I think it's possible to be
liked simultaneously in any number of 'musical
communities' if the music is broad in its range and well
written. It should be able to touch different people at
different levels. Maybe the recent electronic music hasn't
been able to reach a broader audience because it hasn't
tried to, so to speak? Maybe it's been written, in the
main, for a specific audience or market and so was,
inherently, self limiting? But, as I say, I really don't
know.
EN:
Anything you would like to add or say to your fans?
Gary:
Thank you, as always, sorry the new album is taking so
long and I hope you think it's been worth the wait when it
does eventually come out next year.
 
FEATURE WRITTEN AND CONDUCTED BY:
Craig Smidt
Copyright 1999-2010 ELECTROGARDEN.COM, All Rights Reserved. This feature may not be reprinted in any fashion, either in part or in whole without written consent from ELECTROGARDEN.COM. |